On a whole, the iMac is a faster (better) machine, but not portable. There is much more to a system than the CPU. The iMac has a much better video card and a larger screen with a higher resolution. Geekbench 6 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 2,500 (which is the score of a Dell. These scores are the average of 1,485 user results uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. The article also shows the i5 outperforming the i7 in power consumption, which should be a deciding factor when buying a notebook.īut at the end of the day, you are comparing a notebook with a desktop, so it's a little lopsided. The Mac Studio with an Apple M1 Ultra processor scores 2,382 for single-core performance and 17,756 for multi-core performance in the Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark. The i7 has hyperthreading (hence seeing the 8 cores) but that doesn't do enough to give it a substantial lead. It uses demo web applications to simulate user actions such as. The Macs you list would favour the heavier clockspeed on the i5. Speedometer is a browser benchmark that measures the responsiveness of Web applications. These scores are the average of 182 user results uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. The iMac (27-inch Retina) with an Intel Core i5-4690 processor scores 1,109 for single-core performance and 3,111 for multi-core performance in the Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark. Make note that this is a lopsided comparison in favour of the i7 (if only marginally). The iMac (27-inch Retina) is a Mac desktop with an Intel Core i5-4690 processor. Upload Date: J09:01 PM: Views: 6: System Information. Geekbench 6.1.0 for macOS AVX2 Result Information. Top Single-Core Results Top Multi-Core Results Recent Results. Data shows the i7 inched ahead by an average of a 3% performance improvement on the whole. Benchmark results for a MacBook Pro (13-inch Mid 2019) with an Intel Core i5-8279U processor. This article compared the i5 750 (2.66 GHz clockspeed) vs. With Mac Pro, users can combine two Radeon Pro GPUs with 64GB each, or even add up to 1.5TB of RAM – components that have more impact than CPU performance for some tasks.Īccording to Apple, the company still has plans to introduce a new Mac Pro with Apple Silicon at some point, and this makes me wonder how powerful the chip created for this machine will be.They are the same, or the i5 would be infinitesimally faster, which would translate into no real world difference (certainly none above perceptual thresholds). The numbers are certainly surprising since Mac Studio is much more compact and efficient than Mac Pro, but that doesn’t mean that the M1 Ultra chip makes Mac Studio better than Mac Pro in every scenario. This means that M1 Ultra is about 20% faster than the most expensive CPU available for the Intel Mac Pro. The 28-core Intel Xeon W-3275M processor, which is the best you can get with Mac Pro, scores 19951 in Multi Core. But how does this compare to Intel’s high-end processors? However, when it comes to multi-core, the 20-core M1 Ultra scores 24055 in the Geekbench 5 test. Unsurprisingly, M1 Ultra scores 1747 in single-core, which is almost the same as other M1 variants (since the main difference between them is the number of cores). However, a leaked Geekbench result revealed that the M1 Ultra chip is more powerful than the 28-core Intel Xeon W, which is the highest-end processor available for Apple’s tower computer. On its website, Apple compares the new chip to the 16-core Intel Xeon W processor found in the Mac Pro. To give us a better idea of that performance, a Geekbench test shows that Apple’s latest chip beats the 28-core Intel Mac Pro. However, the company also offers a more expensive model with M1 Ultra, a new Apple Silicon chip that is even faster than the M1 Max. Benchmark results for a MacBook Pro (13-inch Mid 2017) with an Intel Core i5-7360U processor. Apple on Tuesday introduced Mac Studio, which comes with the powerful M1 Max chip by default.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |